Arbitration Department showed the dialectical cases of the matches of the 17th round of the league.

Mark
Written By Mark

The Arbitration Department of the Qatar Football Association explained all the dialectical cases witnessed by the 17th round of the Stars League, which was held on Thursday and Friday 27 and 28 February, for the sports season 2024/2025, by making illustrative videos for these cases.
This is in the interest of the federation’s arbitration administration to implement the principle of transparency and enlighten the sports public opinion with the correct information about the arbitration cases witnessed by each of the league matches.
Among the most prominent cases that the round witnessed in the Al -Arabi and Al -Rayyan match in the fifth minute is correct to calculate the goal of Al -Rayyan, as the teammate of the Al -Rayyan striker who scored the goal and is present in an infiltration situation that had no influence on the Al -Arabi team goalkeeper, and that the situation that occurred in the middle of the stadium was the payment by Al -Rayyan defender on the Arab striker very simple and does not rise to calculate a violation on Al -Rayyan defender, and confirmed the assistant video judgment on the validity of the ruling.

It was also emphasized the validity of the referee’s decision because a goal was not calculated in favor of Al -Rayyan in the 57th minute due to the presence of a hand on the Al -Rayyan striker, which preceded his score directly. In the 70th minute, the referee’s decision was correct to calculate a penalty for Al -Rayyan and publicize the yellow card for the Arab defender for holding his opponent inside his penalty area, as the arbitration department confirmed that Al -Arabi was not right for two penalty kicks in the 88th minute and the 90+2 minute, and another kick in the 90+7 minute, in the first case the decision was correct to continue playing and not calculating a penalty for the Arab attacker. Al -Rayyan defender did not commit any violation and the friction between him and the Arab striker was normal, and in the second case the decision is also true to continue playing and not calculating a penalty for the same reason and the third case was also the decision was correct to continue playing and not calculating a penalty for the Arab, as the Al -Rayyan defender put his hand on the body of the Arab striker in an impressive manner and the case does not rise to calculate a penalty kick.
In the Al -Duhail and Al -Shahaniya match, the arbitration department confirmed in the illustration that the first case in the 63rd minute was correct to calculate a penalty for the Al -Shahaniya team because of the Duhail defender, who grabbed the opponent inside his penalty area, and in the 86th minute the decision was also true to cancel a penalty kick in favor of Al -Shahaniya after he was summoned by the video ruling because there was no violation of the defender And the referee had to warn the Al -Shahaniya player to circumvent and resume playing with a free kick directly.
In the 98th minute, the referee’s decision was correct to continue playing and not calculating a penalty for the candidate, as the Al -Duhail goalkeeper succeeded in playing the ball first, then friction occurred with the Al -Shahaniya striker and was a natural friction.
The validity of the expelling of Al -Gharafa Sido Sano was also confirmed in the 87th minute of Al -Gharafa and Al -Sadd, because he prevented the opportunity to score a certain goal with the availability of all considerations.
It was confirmed that a penalty kick was calculated in favor of the Qatar team in its match against Umm Salal in the 39th minute due to the presence of a hand touch on Umm Salal defender inside the penalty area and the hand was in an abnormal position outside the body.
Several dialectical cases in the tour were also explained, and you can follow these cases through the arbitration cases page on the Qatar Football Association website, or by clicking on the following link: www.qfa.qa/case